This topic was automatically generated from Slack. You can find the original thread here.
Raymond Camden : i know yall fixed support for using import… but if you use imprt, you can’t use require anymore? ie you cant mix and match?
This topic was automatically generated from Slack. You can find the original thread here.
Raymond Camden : i know yall fixed support for using import… but if you use imprt, you can’t use require anymore? ie you cant mix and match?
Dylan Sather : That’s correct. But almost all Node packages should support ESM syntax (import), so often it’s just a matter of converting your require to import: https://pipedream.com/docs/workflows/steps/code/#require-is-not-defined
Raymond Camden : i dont believe my package can do that - but - i can use the import in a step
Raymond Camden : you know offhand if binarydata can be exported from a step?
Dylan Sather : I’d recommend base64 encoding it and decoding it in the next step.
Also give the import a try before you separate into different steps - it’s very common for a module to support both
Raymond Camden : its our (Adobe PDF Services) SDK - I’m 99% sure we don’t
Raymond Camden : so right now im posting a large b64 string. i have a step that gets the b64 via body.raw_body_url. shoul di export the b64 from the step or the binary conversion? the workflow editor seemed to get angry at that
Raymond Camden : by that i mean - i exported the binary from a step, and i can tell when the editor tries to provide code completion, its hanging hard
Dylan Sather (Pipedream) : Can you instead try to write the data (binary or base64) to a file in /tmp
, and reading it in the next step? Working with the filesystem in Node.js
Raymond Camden : i think i’ll need to
Raymond Camden : is there a way to ‘flush’ a workflow editor’s cache? its super laggy now
Dylan Sather (Pipedream) : try deleting all of the prior events (the button at the bottom of the inspector)
Dylan Sather (Pipedream) : btw I don’t mean to push at all, but I got the Node SDK working with import
if you want to give it a try: https://pipedream.com/@dylburger/adobe-pdf-services-import-example-p_vQC25jK/edit
Raymond Camden : no you arent pushy i was convinced it didnt, glad to be wrong
Dylan Sather (Pipedream) : I was equally unaware how many modules were published in the “hybrid” (ESM + CJS) manner
Raymond Camden : im going to keep it as require as i like my “suck down the b64, make binary, and store” part is in its own step
Raymond Camden : i know i asked this before, but are writes/reads to /tmp/* unique? the docs say, “For high-volume workflows, data may get retained across workflow executions…”, so if i write to /tmp/foo.txt and read from it, is it possible 2 calls at the same time will get incorrect data? (assuming both write different values to foo.txt)
Dylan Sather (Pipedream) : if you invoke a workflow twice at the same time, each invocation would get its own “execution environment”, and /tmp
would be unique to each environment.
The docs refer to the case where you have one invocation, then another one minute later. /tmp
will stick around from the first run in that case.
Dylan Sather (Pipedream) : in general, clear /tmp
at the end of each run
Raymond Camden : k - so i dont need to make a unique filename